Analysis of Management in High-Tech Manufacturing Company

Organisational Network Analysis — Reporting Lines, Advice & Friendship

Connectivity
Network density
Information Speed
Avg. path length
Silo Index
Community modularity
Communities
Distinct clusters
Succession Risk
Change Management
Collaborative Overload
Silos & Alignment
Network Periphery
Innovation Brokers
Cultural Integration Health
Flight Risk Contagion
Hidden Bureaucracy

Analysing network…

Select a layer and click Run Analysis

Run an analysis to see
network insights here.

Person Profile

Metric Glossary

Click any node to see their individual profile. These metrics explain what the network data means for your organisation.

Connectivity
How well-linked the management team is. High connectivity reduces the risk of communication silos and ensures strategic decisions propagate quickly through the organisation.
Brokerage
Identifies managers who act as bridges between departments. These individuals are critical for cross-functional alignment — their absence would fragment the leadership network.
Siloing Risk
Measures how isolated different management clusters have become. A high score suggests the leadership team has fragmented, which can impede coordinated decision-making.
Influence
Captures whose judgement carries the most weight in the advice network. A highly influential manager is connected to other well-connected peers — their views shape the organisation's direction.
Information Speed
The average number of steps needed to pass information between any two managers. Shorter paths indicate faster, more agile decision-making across the leadership team.
Hierarchy Alignment
Compares where managers seek advice against the formal reporting structure. Low alignment reveals informal networks that bypass the org chart — which may indicate gaps in the designed authority structure.
Community Detection
Groups of managers more densely connected to each other than to the rest. Communities often correspond to departments, project teams, or informal leadership coalitions.

Node colour

Node size = selected centrality

Highest influence
Moderate influence
Lower influence
 Network Influence Leader

The Composite Influence Score identifies the true all-rounders in the management network — individuals who score highly across all three core centrality dimensions simultaneously. Betweenness captures information brokerage between teams, PageRank captures sustainable peer influence, and Closeness captures strategic accessibility across the organisation. A high composite score signals a manager whose departure would simultaneously reduce information flow, lower collective influence, and increase average coordination distances across the hierarchy.

# Name Score Role Seniority Level Department Tenure (yrs) Hub Authority

These managers act as bridges between different departments and teams. They control the flow of information and are critical for preventing organisational silos. Removing a key gatekeeper can fragment the leadership network overnight.

#NameScoreDetails

This metric measures sustainable, organisation-wide influence. It highlights individuals who are critical to the flow of information, whilst mathematically correcting for 'knowledge hoarders' who receive advice but rarely pass it on.

#NameScoreDetails

Measures the volume of direct day-to-day interactions. High scorers maintain the broadest active relationships across the management team and are well-placed for rapid communication or strategic rollouts.

#NameScoreDetails

This metric reveals the dual nature of influence in the network. Subject Experts (Authorities) are the deep knowledge centres frequently sought out for answers. Knowledge Navigators (Hubs) are the essential connectors who might not hold the answers themselves, but efficiently route people to the exact experts who do.

Subject Experts — Authority Score

#NameScoreDetails

Knowledge Navigators — Hub Score

#NameScoreDetails